↓ Skip to main content

Graded exercise therapy should not be recommended for patients with post-exertional malaise

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,882)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1164 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graded exercise therapy should not be recommended for patients with post-exertional malaise
Published in
Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41569-024-00992-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke Christina Ching-Chuan van Rhijn-Brouwer, Merel Hellemons, Michael Stingl, Kathryn Hoffmann, Joanne VanDerNagel, Todd E. Davenport, Eva Untersmayr, Carmen Scheibenbogen, David Putrino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 744. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#27,883
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#6
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 370,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.