↓ Skip to main content

Sustained production of ROS triggers compensatory proliferation and is required for regeneration to proceed

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustained production of ROS triggers compensatory proliferation and is required for regeneration to proceed
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carole Gauron, Christine Rampon, Mohamed Bouzaffour, Eliane Ipendey, Jérémie Teillon, Michel Volovitch, Sophie Vriz

Abstract

A major issue in regenerative medicine is the role of injury in promoting cell plasticity. Here we explore the function of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced through lesions in adult zebrafish. We show that ROS production, following adult fin amputation, is tightly regulated in time and space for at least 24 hours, whereas ROS production remains transient (2 hours) in mere wound healing. In regenerative tissue, ROS signaling triggers two distinct parallel pathways: one pathway is responsible for apoptosis, and the other pathway is responsible for JNK activation. Both events are involved in the compensatory proliferation of stump epidermal cells and are necessary for the progression of regeneration. Both events impact the Wnt, SDF1 and IGF pathways, while apoptosis only impacts progenitor marker expression. These results implicate oxidative stress in regeneration and provide new insights into the differences between healing and regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 269 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 23%
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 6%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 32%
Engineering 7 2%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 48 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,623,987
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#51,667
of 128,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,289
of 198,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#220
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.