↓ Skip to main content

T1 and extracellular volume mapping in the heart: estimation of error maps and the influence of noise on precision

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T1 and extracellular volume mapping in the heart: estimation of error maps and the influence of noise on precision
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kellman, Andrew E Arai, Hui Xue

Abstract

Quantitative measurements in the myocardium may be used to detect both focal and diffuse disease processes that result in an elevation of T1 and/or extracellular volume (ECV) fraction. Detection of abnormal myocardial tissue by these methods is affected by both the accuracy and precision. The sensitivity for detecting abnormal elevation of T1 and ECV is limited by the precision of T1 estimates which is a function of the number and timing of measurements along the T1-inversion recovery curve, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the tissue T1, and the method of fitting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 169 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 44%
Engineering 26 15%
Physics and Astronomy 13 7%
Computer Science 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,344,962
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#371
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,493
of 209,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.