The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting the spatial distribution of wintering golden eagles to inform full annual cycle conservation in western North America.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0297345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zachary P Wallace, Bryan E Bedrosian, Jeffrey R Dunk, David W LaPlante, Brian Woodbridge, Brian W Smith, Jessi L Brown, Todd M Lickfett, Katherine Gura, Dave Bittner, Ross H Crandall, Rob Domenech, Todd E Katzner, Kevin J Kritz, Stephen B Lewis, Michael J Lockhart, Tricia A Miller, Katie Quint, Adam Shreading, Steve J Slater, Dale W Stahlecker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,281,077
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,929
of 221,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,399
of 267,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#404
of 3,874 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,874 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.