↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary artery diameter ratio as a prognostic indicator of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 191)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary artery diameter ratio as a prognostic indicator of congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Published in
World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, January 2024
DOI 10.1136/wjps-2023-000686
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichiro Miyake, Hiroyuki Koga, Shuko Nojiri, Shunsuke Yamada, Takanori Ochi, Go Miyano, Geoffrey J Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Tadaharu Okazaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,623,541
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#15
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,061
of 346,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.