↓ Skip to main content

Marine Biodiversity in South Africa: An Evaluation of Current States of Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
548 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Marine Biodiversity in South Africa: An Evaluation of Current States of Knowledge
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles L. Griffiths, Tamara B. Robinson, Louise Lange, Angela Mead

Abstract

Continental South Africa has a coastline of some 3,650 km and an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of just over 1 million km(2). Waters in the EEZ extend to a depth of 5,700 m, with more than 65% deeper than 2,000 m. Despite its status as a developing nation, South Africa has a relatively strong history of marine taxonomic research and maintains comprehensive and well-curated museum collections totaling over 291,000 records. Over 3 million locality records from more than 23,000 species have been lodged in the regional AfrOBIS (African Ocean Biogeographic Information System) data center (which stores data from a wider African region). A large number of regional guides to the marine fauna and flora are also available and are listed. The currently recorded marine biota of South Africa numbers at least 12,914 species, although many taxa, particularly those of small body size, remain poorly documented. The coastal zone is relatively well sampled with some 2,500 samples of benthic invertebrate communities have been taken by grab, dredge, or trawl. Almost none of these samples, however, were collected after 1980, and over 99% of existing samples are from depths shallower than 1,000 m--indeed 83% are from less than 100 m. The abyssal zone thus remains almost completely unexplored. South Africa has a fairly large industrial fishing industry, of which the largest fisheries are the pelagic (pilchard and anchovy) and demersal (hake) sectors, both focused on the west and south coasts. The east coast has fewer, smaller commercial fisheries, but a high coastal population density, resulting in intense exploitation of inshore resources by recreational and subsistence fishers, and this has resulted in the overexploitation of many coastal fish and invertebrate stocks. South Africa has a small aquaculture industry rearing mussels, oysters, prawns, and abalone-the latter two in land-based facilities. Compared with many other developing countries, South Africa has a well-conserved coastline, 23% of which is under formal protection, however deeper waters are almost entirely excluded from conservation areas. Marine pollution is confined mainly to the densely populated KwaZulu-Natal coast and the urban centers of Cape Town and Port Elizabeth. Over 120 introduced or cryptogenic marine species have been recorded, but most of these are confined to the few harbors and sheltered sites along the coast.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 548 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 16 3%
Brazil 4 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 518 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 114 21%
Researcher 91 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 14%
Student > Postgraduate 65 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 77 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 255 47%
Environmental Science 123 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 89 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,582,239
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#62,631
of 193,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,064
of 94,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#269
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.