↓ Skip to main content

Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
13 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2013.316
Pubmed ID
Authors

A El Turabi, G A Abel, M Roland, G Lyratzopoulos

Abstract

Exploring variation in patients' experiences of involvement in treatment decision making can identify groups needing extra support, such as additional consultation time, when considering treatment options.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Unspecified 7 9%
Other 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Unspecified 11 15%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2018.
All research outputs
#463,180
of 12,701,041 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#233
of 7,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,561
of 150,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#6
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,701,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.