↓ Skip to main content

Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2013.316
Pubmed ID
Authors

A El Turabi, G A Abel, M Roland, G Lyratzopoulos

Abstract

Exploring variation in patients' experiences of involvement in treatment decision making can identify groups needing extra support, such as additional consultation time, when considering treatment options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#875,161
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#295
of 10,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,646
of 196,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#4
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.