↓ Skip to main content

Does administrative burden create racialized policy feedback? How losing access to public benefits impacts beliefs about government

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does administrative burden create racialized policy feedback? How losing access to public benefits impacts beliefs about government
Published in
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, February 2024
DOI 10.1093/jopart/muae004
Authors

Elizabeth Bell, James E Wright, Jeongmin Oh

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,375,729
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#53
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,453
of 387,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them