↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive and Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer’s Disease–related Biomarker Trajectories in Older Surgical Patients and Matched Nonsurgical Controls

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive and Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer’s Disease–related Biomarker Trajectories in Older Surgical Patients and Matched Nonsurgical Controls
Published in
Anesthesiology, February 2024
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000004924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melody Reese, Megan K. Wong, Vanessa Cheong, Christine I. Ha, Mary Cooter Wright, Jeffrey Browndyke, Eugene Moretti, Michael J. Devinney, Ashraf S. Habib, Judd W. Moul, Leslie M. Shaw, Teresa Waligorska, Heather E. Whitson, Harvey J. Cohen, Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer, Brenda L. Plassman, Joseph P. Mathew, Miles Berger, C. L. Amundsen, S. Bengali, E. Bennett, M. F. Berry, D. G. Blazer, M. P. Bolognesi, R. Brassard, B. E. Brigman, M. Bullock, J. Carter, J. Chapman, B. Colin, T. A. D’Amico, J. K. DeOrio, D. Erdmann, R. M. Esclamado, M. Ferrandino, B. Funk, J. Gadsden, J. Gardner, G. Garrigues, C. Giattino, D. T. Gold, S. Grant, J. Guercio, D. K. Gupta, A. Habib, D. H. Harpole, S. M. Harris, M. G. Hartwig, S. T. Hollenbeck, J. Hu, E. Iboaya, B. A. Inman, D. W. Jang, J. Kaisen, A. Khan, S. Lagoo-Deenadayalan, D. T. Laskowitz, P. S. Lee, W. T. Lee, J. Lemm, H. Levinson, M. E. Lipkin, C. R. Mantyh, D. L. McDonagh, J. Migaly, S. K. Mithani, P. Mosca, J. Moul, M. F. Newman, K. Ni, B. Ohlendorf, M. W. Onaitis, T. N. Pappas, A. N. Perez, A. C. Peterson, T. J. Polascik, A. Podgoreanu, G. M. Preminger, Q. Quinones, E. N. Rampersaud, A. Ray, K. Roberts, C. N. Robertson, S. A. Roman, S. Runyon, A. Sandler, F. Sbahi, C. D. Scales, R. P. Scheri, S. K. Smith, L. Talbot, J. K. M. Thacker, J. Thomas, B. C. Tong, Y. Toulgoat-Dubois, A. Tu, S. N. Vaslef, J. Whittle, M. Woldorff, N. Waldron, D. S. Warner, X. Wang, S. S. Wellman, T. Wickenheisser, C. Young, S. Zani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,348,754
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#497
of 6,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,884
of 341,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.