↓ Skip to main content

The call to action: health promotion in The Gambia – closing the implementation gap?

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health Promotion, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The call to action: health promotion in The Gambia – closing the implementation gap?
Published in
Global Health Promotion, June 2013
DOI 10.1177/1757975913486682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachael Dixey, Modou Njai

Abstract

This paper discusses the difficulties facing the development of health promotion in The Gambia, and in 'closing the implementation gap' noted by the WHO 7(th) Global Conference on Health Promotion (2009, Nairobi). The Gambia has achieved a great deal so far, but health promotion as a discipline has not really informed the development of its approach to health. There is not a central concern with determinants of health and tackling health inequalities and there is no well-developed health promotion infrastructure. The difficulties facing sub-Saharan Africa generally can be extrapolated from the paper, with the conclusion that sub-Saharan Africa faces many disease and health challenges not experienced by richer countries and thus not only does the discourse of health promotion need to take this into account, but also the basic needs of Africa need to be placed at the forefront.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 27%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,877
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Promotion
#728
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,088
of 196,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Promotion
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.