The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004184.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chuncheng Wu, Ping Zhao, Ping Xu, Chaomin Wan, Surjit Singh, Shoban Babu Varthya, Shuang-Hong Luo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 83% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#918,675
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,659
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,017
of 384,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.