↓ Skip to main content

Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae): Botanical Properties, Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
483 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae): Botanical Properties, Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), July 2013
DOI 10.1155/2013/340215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arlene P. Bartolome, Irene M. Villaseñor, Wen-Chin Yang

Abstract

There are 230 to 240 known Bidens species. Among them, Bidens pilosa is a representative perennial herb, globally distributed across temperate and tropical regions. B. pilosa has been traditionally used in foods and medicines without obvious adverse effects. Despite significant progress in phytochemical and biological analyses of B. pilosa over the past few years, comprehensive and critical reviews of this plant are anachronistic or relatively limited in scope. The present review aims to summarize up-to-date information on the phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of B. pilosa from the literature. In addition to botanical studies and records of the traditional use of B. pilosa in over 40 diseases, scientific studies investigating the potential medicinal uses of this species and its constituent phytochemicals for a variety of disorders are presented and discussed. The structure, bioactivity, and likely mechanisms of action of B. pilosa and its phytochemicals are emphasized. Although some progress has been made, further rigorous efforts are required to investigate the individual compounds isolated from B. pilosa to understand and validate its traditional uses and develop clinical applications. The present review provides preliminary information and gives guidance for further basic and clinical research into this plant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 481 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 85 18%
Student > Master 52 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 6%
Researcher 25 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 73 15%
Unknown 192 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 8%
Chemistry 30 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 4%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 204 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,782,199
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#1,423
of 9,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,376
of 206,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#54
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.