You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ネコ好きとイヌ好きでパーソナリティは異なるか(2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.4992/pacjpa.75.0_1ev020 |
| Authors |
齋藤 慈子, 中村 敏健, 平石 界, 長谷川 寿一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#51
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,610
of 450,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.