↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000493.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinita Gurung, Michael Stokes, Philippa Middleton, Stephen J Milan, William Hague, Jim G Thornton

Abstract

Obstetric cholestasis has been linked to adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. As the pathophysiology is poorly understood, therapies have been empiric. The first version of this review, published in 2001, and including nine randomised controlled trials involving 227 women, concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any of the interventions alone or in combination. This is the first update.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 1%
Student > Master 1 <1%
Researcher 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,623,601
of 12,395,470 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,239
of 8,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,618
of 148,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,395,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.