↓ Skip to main content

Global scientific progress and shortfalls in biological control of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Control, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global scientific progress and shortfalls in biological control of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda
Published in
Biological Control, April 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105460
Authors

Kris A.G. Wyckhuys, Komivi S. Akutse, Divina M. Amalin, Salah-Eddin Araj, Gloria Barrera, Marie Joy B. Beltran, Ibtissem Ben Fekih, Paul-André Calatayud, Lizette Cicero, Marcellin C. Cokola, Yelitza C. Colmenarez, Kenza Dessauvages, Thomas Dubois, Léna Durocher-Granger, Carlos Espinel, Patrick Fallet, José L. Fernández-Triana, Frederic Francis, Juliana Gómez, Khalid Haddi, Rhett D. Harrison, Muhammad Haseeb, Natasha S.A. Iwanicki, Lara R. Jaber, Fathiya M. Khamis, Jesusa C. Legaspi, Refugio J. Lomeli-Flores, Rogerio B. Lopes, Baoqian Lyu, James Montoya-Lerma, Melissa P. Montecalvo, Andrew Polaszek, Tung D. Nguyen, Ihsan Nurkomar, James E. O'Hara, Jermaine D. Perier, Ricardo Ramírez-Romero, Francisco J. Sánchez-García, Ann M. Robinson-Baker, Luis C. Silveira, Larisner Simeon, Leellen F. Solter, Oscar F. Santos-Amaya, Elijah J. Talamas, Wagner de Souza Tavares, Rogelio Trabanino, Ted C.J. Turlings, Fernando H. Valicente, Carlos Vásquez, Zhenying Wang, Ana P.G.S. Wengrat, Lian-Sheng Zang, Wei Zhang, Kennedy J. Zimba, Kongming Wu, Maged Elkahky, Buyung A.R. Hadi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Lecturer 3 12%
Unspecified 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 42%
Unspecified 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,798,987
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biological Control
#153
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,715
of 41,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Control
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them