↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Care and Persistence After Incident Elevated Blood Pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Care and Persistence After Incident Elevated Blood Pressure
Published in
Pediatrics, January 2013
DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-2437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew F. Daley, Alan R. Sinaiko, Liza M. Reifler, Heather M. Tavel, Jason M. Glanz, Karen L. Margolis, Emily Parker, Nicole K. Trower, Malini Chandra, Nancy E. Sherwood, Kenneth Adams, Elyse O. Kharbanda, Louise C. Greenspan, Joan C. Lo, Patrick J. O’Connor, David J. Magid

Abstract

Screening for hypertension in children occurs during routine care. When blood pressure (BP) is elevated in the hypertensive range, a repeat measurement within 1 to 2 weeks is recommended. The objective was to assess patterns of care after an incident elevated BP, including timing of repeat BP measurement and likelihood of persistently elevated BP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#459,223
of 14,514,075 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#2,118
of 13,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,354
of 154,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#26
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,514,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.