You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate appendicular muscle mass in elderly women
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-92 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Piettra Moura Galvão Pereira, Giselma Alcântara da Silva, Gilberto Moreira Santos, Edio Luiz Petroski, Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes |
Abstract |
This study aimed to examine the cross validity of two anthropometric equations commonly used and propose simple anthropometric equations to estimate appendicular muscle mass (AMM) in elderly women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Costa Rica | 1 | 25% |
Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,926,808
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#890
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,962
of 194,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#30
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.