↓ Skip to main content

CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
163 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer
Published in
Nature Genetics, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/ng.3774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malachi Griffith, Nicholas C Spies, Kilannin Krysiak, Joshua F McMichael, Adam C Coffman, Arpad M Danos, Benjamin J Ainscough, Cody A Ramirez, Damian T Rieke, Lynzey Kujan, Erica K Barnell, Alex H Wagner, Zachary L Skidmore, Amber Wollam, Connor J Liu, Martin R Jones, Rachel L Bilski, Robert Lesurf, Yan-Yang Feng, Nakul M Shah, Melika Bonakdar, Lee Trani, Matthew Matlock, Avinash Ramu, Katie M Campbell, Gregory C Spies, Aaron P Graubert, Karthik Gangavarapu, James M Eldred, David E Larson, Jason R Walker, Benjamin M Good, Chunlei Wu, Andrew I Su, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Adam A Margolin, David Tamborero, Nuria Lopez-Bigas, Steven J M Jones, Ron Bose, David H Spencer, Lukas D Wartman, Richard K Wilson, Elaine R Mardis, Obi L Griffith, Griffith, Malachi, Spies, Nicholas C, Krysiak, Kilannin, McMichael, Joshua F, Coffman, Adam C, Danos, Arpad M, Ainscough, Benjamin J, Ramirez, Cody A, Rieke, Damian T, Kujan, Lynzey, Barnell, Erica K, Wagner, Alex H, Skidmore, Zachary L, Wollam, Amber, Liu, Connor J, Jones, Martin R, Bilski, Rachel L, Lesurf, Robert, Feng, Yan-Yang, Shah, Nakul M, Bonakdar, Melika, Trani, Lee, Matlock, Matthew, Ramu, Avinash, Campbell, Katie M, Spies, Gregory C, Graubert, Aaron P, Gangavarapu, Karthik, Eldred, James M, Larson, David E, Walker, Jason R, Good, Benjamin M, Wu, Chunlei, Su, Andrew I, Dienstmann, Rodrigo, Margolin, Adam A, Tamborero, David, Lopez-Bigas, Nuria, Jones, Steven J M, Bose, Ron, Spencer, David H, Wartman, Lukas D, Wilson, Richard K, Mardis, Elaine R, Griffith, Obi L

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Computer Science 4 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#51,606
of 8,729,328 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#141
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,916
of 298,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#16
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,729,328 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.