The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of the internal structure of the Brazilian Dental Vulnerability Scale
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005360 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniele Boina de Oliveira, Flávio Rebustini, Danielle da Costa Palacio, Marcio Cardozo Paresque, Ilana Eshriqui Oliveira, Wander Barbieri, Danielle Viana Ribeiro, Debora Heller, Daiana Bomfim, Tamara Kerber Tedesco |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,826,459
of 26,519,936 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#1,017
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,829
of 394,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,519,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.