You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: findings from a routine dataset
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12887-017-0800-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Marryat, Lucy Thompson, Philip Wilson |
| Abstract |
The Triple P parenting programme has been reported to improve child mental health at population level, but it consumes substantial resources. Previous published work has suggested improvements in whole population scores in the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Scale among samples of children following introduction of the programme. This paper aims to explore whether Triple P had an impact on child mental health problems using routinely collected data over 6 years before and during the implementation of the multilevel Triple P programme in Glasgow City. Annual monitoring of teacher-rated SDQ Total Difficulties Scale scores among children in their pre-school year in Glasgow City. No significant or consistent changes in SDQ Total Difficulties Scale scores were seen during or after the implementation of Triple P programme on a whole population level. Triple P in Glasgow City appears to have had no impact on early child mental health problems over a 6 year period. The Triple P programme, implemented on a whole population level, is unlikely to produce measurable benefits in terms of child mental health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 47% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Scientists | 12 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,182,102
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#113
of 3,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,379
of 431,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.