↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003586.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey Bowen, Christine Hazelton, Alex Pollock, Nadina B Lincoln

Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect causes difficulty attending to one side of space. Various rehabilitation interventions have been used but evidence of their benefit is lacking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 491 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 19%
Researcher 75 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 13%
Student > Bachelor 64 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 8%
Other 169 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 28%
Psychology 120 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 14%
Unspecified 57 11%
Neuroscience 36 7%
Other 84 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#689,233
of 13,605,565 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,178
of 10,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,936
of 152,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.