You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Precision needle-punch tumor enrichment from paraffin blocks improves the detection of clinically actionable genomic alterations and biomarkers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1328512 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Douglas I. Lin, Richard S. P. Huang, Ioannis Ladas, Rachel B. Keller, Nimesh R. Patel, Sotirios Lakis, Brennan Decker, Tyler Janovitz, Douglas A. Mata, Jeffrey S. Ross, Jo-Anne Vergilio, Julia A. Elvin, Roy S. Herbst, Philip C. Mack, Jonathan K. Killian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,586,565
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,638
of 22,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,937
of 341,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#54
of 827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.