You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide fluxes differ from tea plantation and tropical forest soils after nitrogen addition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1335775 |
| Authors |
Galina Y. Toteva, David Reay, Matthew R. Jones, Nicholas Cowan, Ajinkya Deshpande, Buddhika Weerakoon, Sarath Nissanka, Julia Drewer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,605,195
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,003
of 345,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them