↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Hearing Loss after Blast Injury to the Ear

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of Hearing Loss after Blast Injury to the Ear
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067618
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung-Il Cho, Simon S. Gao, Anping Xia, Rosalie Wang, Felipe T. Salles, Patrick D. Raphael, Homer Abaya, Jacqueline Wachtel, Jongmin Baek, David Jacobs, Matthew N. Rasband, John S. Oghalai

Abstract

Given the frequent use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) around the world, the study of traumatic blast injuries is of increasing interest. The ear is the most common organ affected by blast injury because it is the body's most sensitive pressure transducer. We fabricated a blast chamber to re-create blast profiles similar to that of IEDs and used it to develop a reproducible mouse model to study blast-induced hearing loss. The tympanic membrane was perforated in all mice after blast exposure and found to heal spontaneously. Micro-computed tomography demonstrated no evidence for middle ear or otic capsule injuries; however, the healed tympanic membrane was thickened. Auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emission threshold shifts were found to be correlated with blast intensity. As well, these threshold shifts were larger than those found in control mice that underwent surgical perforation of their tympanic membranes, indicating cochlear trauma. Histological studies one week and three months after the blast demonstrated no disruption or damage to the intra-cochlear membranes. However, there was loss of outer hair cells (OHCs) within the basal turn of the cochlea and decreased spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and afferent nerve synapses. Using our mouse model that recapitulates human IED exposure, our results identify that the mechanisms underlying blast-induced hearing loss does not include gross membranous rupture as is commonly believed. Instead, there is both OHC and SGN loss that produce auditory dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 21%
Engineering 23 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,356,961
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,370
of 210,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,448
of 198,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#477
of 4,806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.