↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of intensive community care services for young people with psychiatric emergencies: study protocol for a multi-centre parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with an…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of intensive community care services for young people with psychiatric emergencies: study protocol for a multi-centre parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with an internal pilot phase
Published in
Trials, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13063-024-07974-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thilipan Thaventhiran, Ben Hoi-Ching Wong, Izabela Pilecka, Saba Masood, Opeyemi Atanda, Joe Clacey, Jovanka Tolmac, Leon Wehncke, Liana Romaniuk, Margaret Heslin, Emma Tassie, Petrina Chu, Rhys Bevan-Jones, Ruth Woolhouse, Tauseef Mahdi, Veronika Beatrice Dobler, Mandy Wait, Paula Reavey, Sabine Landau, Sarah Byford, Toby Zundel, Dennis Ougrin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,923,424
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,154
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,727
of 345,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them