You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artery of Percheron Infarction: Imaging Patterns and Clinical Spectrum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a2044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N.A. Lazzaro, B. Wright, M. Castillo, N.J. Fischbein, C.M. Glastonbury, P.G. Hildenbrand, R.H. Wiggins, E.P. Quigley, A.G. Osborn |
| Abstract |
Occlusion of the AOP results in a characteristic pattern of ischemia: bilateral paramedian thalamus with or without midbrain involvement. Although the classic imaging findings are often recognized, only a few small case series and isolated cases of AOP infarction have been reported. The purpose of this study was to characterize the complete imaging spectrum of AOP infarction on the basis of a large series of cases obtained from multiple institutions. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 16% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| Mexico | 7 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 6% |
| Chile | 5 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 24% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 59% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#754,551
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#57
of 5,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,407
of 109,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.