↓ Skip to main content

A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
101 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2024
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2313205121
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Gill, Sarah E. Lester, Christopher M. Free, Alexander Pfaff, Edwin Iversen, Brian J. Reich, Shu Yang, Gabby Ahmadia, Dominic A. Andradi-Brown, Emily S. Darling, Graham J. Edgar, Helen E. Fox, Jonas Geldmann, Duong Trung Le, Michael B. Mascia, Roosevelt Mesa-Gutiérrez, Peter J. Mumby, Laura Veverka, Laura M. Warmuth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#300,547
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,453
of 104,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,469
of 340,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#85
of 907 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 907 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.