You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
eC-CLEM: flexible multidimensional registration software for correlative microscopies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux, Xavier Heiligenstein, Martin Belle, Marie-Charlotte Domart, Banafshe Larijani, Lucy Collinson, Graça Raposo, Jean Salamero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 32% |
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
| Researcher | 40 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,189,439
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,342
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,166
of 428,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#47
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.