You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Machine learning identifies fatigue as a key symptom of fibromyalgia reflected in tyrosine, purine, pyrimidine, and glutaminergic metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cts.13740 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teemu Zetterman, Anni I. Nieminen, Ritva Markkula, Eija Kalso, Jörn Lötsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 4% |
| Romania | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 40% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,397,848
of 25,942,066 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#99
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,179
of 340,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,942,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.