@csu_bt @cducsubt @CSU 🍀A review concluded that there is "no direct relationship between impairment & Δ9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) concentrations in blood or saliva, making legal 'per se' Δ9-THC limits scientifically unjustified" https://t.co/GaM2
@kristine_lutke 🍀A review concluded that there is "no direct relationship between impairment & Δ9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) concentrations in blood or saliva, making legal 'per se' Δ9-THC limits scientifically unjustified" https://t.co/GaM26X68yB
@Karl_Lauterbach 🍀A review concluded that there is "no direct relationship between impairment & Δ9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) concentrations in blood or saliva, making legal 'per se' Δ9-THC limits scientifically unjustified" https://t.co/GaM26X68yB
@HomegrowPro 🍀A review concluded that there is "no direct relationship between impairment & Δ9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) concentrations in blood or saliva, making legal 'per se' Δ9-THC limits scientifically unjustified" https://t.co/GaM26X68yB ht