↓ Skip to main content

Correcting for Mortality Among Patients Lost to Follow Up on Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa: A Cohort Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correcting for Mortality Among Patients Lost to Follow Up on Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa: A Cohort Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilles Van Cutsem, Nathan Ford, Katherine Hildebrand, Eric Goemaere, Shaheed Mathee, Musaed Abrahams, David Coetzee, Andrew Boulle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Niger 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 44%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2011.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,773
of 195,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,690
of 106,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#644
of 1,287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.