You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stenting the neonatal arterial duct
|
---|---|
Published in |
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1586/14779072.5.5.893 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Derize E Boshoff, Ina Michel-Behnke, Dietmar Schranz, Marc Gewillig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 52% |
Engineering | 3 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
#194
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,316
of 306,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
#62
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.