You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing prolonged infusion to intermittent infusion strategies for beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14787210.2024.2324940 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chih-Chung Lin, Jheng-Yen Wu, Po-Yu Huang, Hui-Lin Sung, Yu-Chun Tung, Chih-Cheng Lai, Yu-Feng Wei, Pin-Kuei Fu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 10% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#881,095
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy
#34
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,692
of 337,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.