↓ Skip to main content

The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia
Published in
Clinics, January 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(sup01)05
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nabil Aziz

Abstract

Azoospermia is a descriptive term referring to ejaculates that lack spermatozoa without implying a specific underlying cause. The traditional definition of azoospermia is ambiguous, which has ramifications on the diagnostic criteria. This issue is further compounded by the apparent overlap between the definitions of oligospermia and azoospermia. The reliable diagnosis of the absence of spermatozoa in a semen sample is an important criterion not only for diagnosing male infertility but also for ascertaining the success of a vasectomy and for determining the efficacy of hormonal contraception. There appears to be different levels of rigor in diagnosing azoospermia in different clinical situations, which highlights the conflict between scientific research and clinical practice in defining azoospermia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 30%