↓ Skip to main content

The Role of bZIP Transcription Factors in Green Plant Evolution: Adaptive Features Emerging from Four Founder Genes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of bZIP Transcription Factors in Green Plant Evolution: Adaptive Features Emerging from Four Founder Genes
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Gustavo Guedes Corrêa, Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón, Carlos Guerra Schrago, Renato Vicentini dos Santos, Bernd Mueller-Roeber, Michel Vincentz

Abstract

Transcription factors of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family control important processes in all eukaryotes. In plants, bZIPs are regulators of many central developmental and physiological processes including photomorphogenesis, leaf and seed formation, energy homeostasis, and abiotic and biotic stress responses. Here we performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bZIP genes from algae, mosses, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 295 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 24%
Researcher 65 21%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 18%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 49 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,155,645
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,880
of 193,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,257
of 82,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#173
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.