You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does the Epi-No® Birth Trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-011-1517-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ka Lai Shek, Varisara Chantarasorn, Susanne Langer, Hala Phipps, Hans Peter Dietz |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether antepartum use of a birth trainer may reduce levator trauma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,853
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,490
of 130,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.