↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for saprotrophic digestion of glossopterid pollen from Permian silicified peats of Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Grana, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 255)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for saprotrophic digestion of glossopterid pollen from Permian silicified peats of Antarctica
Published in
Grana, March 2024
DOI 10.1080/00173134.2024.2312610
Authors

Stephen McLoughlin, Olena A. Shevchuk, Megan M. Windell, Ben J. Slater

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,411,546
of 26,107,266 outputs
Outputs from Grana
#25
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,784
of 346,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Grana
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them