↓ Skip to main content

Novel deletion of RPL15 identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization in Diamond–Blackfan anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel deletion of RPL15 identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization in Diamond–Blackfan anemia
Published in
Human Genetics, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00439-013-1326-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Landowski, Marie-Françoise O’Donohue, Christopher Buros, Roxanne Ghazvinian, Nathalie Montel-Lehry, Adrianna Vlachos, Colin A. Sieff, Peter E. Newburger, Edyta Niewiadomska, Michal Matysiak, Bertil Glader, Eva Atsidaftos, Jeffrey M. Lipton, Alan H. Beggs, Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes, Hanna T. Gazda

Abstract

Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is an inherited red blood cell aplasia that usually presents during the first year of life. The main features of the disease are normochromic and macrocytic anemia, reticulocytopenia, and nearly absent erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow. The patients also present with growth retardation and craniofacial, upper limb, heart and urinary system congenital malformations in ~30-50 % of cases. The disease has been associated with point mutations and large deletions in ten ribosomal protein (RP) genes RPS19, RPS24, RPS17, RPL35A, RPL5, RPL11, RPS7, RPS10, RPS26, and RPL26 and GATA1 in about 60-65 % of patients. Here, we report a novel large deletion in RPL15, a gene not previously implicated to be causative in DBA. Like RPL26, RPL15 presents the distinctive feature of being required both for 60S subunit formation and for efficient cleavage of the internal transcribed spacer 1. In addition, we detected five deletions in RP genes in which mutations have been previously shown to cause DBA: one each in RPS19, RPS24, and RPS26, and two in RPS17. Pre-ribosomal RNA processing was affected in cells established from the patients bearing these deletions, suggesting a possible molecular basis for their pathological effect. These data identify RPL15 as a new gene involved in DBA and further support the presence of large deletions in RP genes in DBA patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,877
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,813
of 2,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,515
of 194,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.