↓ Skip to main content

Optimising triage of urgent referrals for suspected IBD: results from the Birmingham IBD inception study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontline gastroenterology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 747)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimising triage of urgent referrals for suspected IBD: results from the Birmingham IBD inception study
Published in
Frontline gastroenterology, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102523
Authors

Peter Rimmer, Jonathan Cheesbrough, Jane Harris, Melanie Love, Samantha Tull, Asif Iqbal, Daniel Regan-Komito, Rachel Cooney, Karl Hazel, Naveen Sharma, Thomas Dietrich, Iain Chapple, Mohammad Nabil Quraishi, Tariq H Iqbal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#616,951
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontline gastroenterology
#20
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,081
of 348,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontline gastroenterology
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.