You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The International Olympic Committee framework on fairness, inclusion and nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations does not protect fairness for female athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/sms.14581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tommy R. Lundberg, Ross Tucker, Kerry McGawley, Alun G. Williams, Grégoire P. Millet, Øyvind Sandbakk, Glyn Howatson, Gregory A. Brown, Lara A. Carlson, Sarah Chantler, Mark A. Chen, Shane M. Heffernan, Neil Heron, Christopher Kirk, Marie H. Murphy, Noel Pollock, Jamie Pringle, Andrew Richardson, Jordan Santos‐Concejero, Georgina K. Stebbings, Ask Vest Christiansen, Stuart M. Phillips, Cathy Devine, Carwyn Jones, Jon Pike, Emma N. Hilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 263 | 19% |
| United States | 110 | 8% |
| Canada | 51 | 4% |
| Ireland | 27 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 27 | 2% |
| Spain | 26 | 2% |
| Australia | 24 | 2% |
| Japan | 16 | 1% |
| Sweden | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 83 | 6% |
| Unknown | 777 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1217 | 86% |
| Scientists | 113 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 29 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,125
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#1
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63
of 325,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.