You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011686.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Tavender, Nitaa Eapen, Junfeng Wang, Vanessa C Rausa, Franz E Babl, Natalie Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,492,308
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,936
of 318,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.