You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364940 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shiqiang Xiong, Shujuan Qin, Lin Tong, Yu Long, Yan Luo, Qiao Feng, Xiufen Peng, Maoling Jiang, Feng Xiong, Jin Li, Yangchun Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu, Lin Cai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,171,264
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,777
of 9,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,097
of 213,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#65
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.