You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The feasibility and acceptability of an app‐based intervention with brief behavioural support (APPROACH) to promote brisk walking in people diagnosed with breast, prostate and colorectal cancer in the UK
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Medicine, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/cam4.7124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phillippa Lally, Fiona Kennedy, Susan Smith, Rebecca J. Beeken, Caroline Buck, Chloe Thomas, Nicholas Counsell, Lynda Wyld, Charlene Martin, Sarah Williams, Anna Roberts, Diana M. Greenfield, Jacqui Gath, Henry W. W. Potts, Nicholas Latimer, Lee Smith, Abi Fisher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 60% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
Scientists | 8 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 36% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Design | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,451,963
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Medicine
#212
of 3,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,950
of 197,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Medicine
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.