↓ Skip to main content

Effects of forest type on carbon storage in the hilly region of Loess Plateau, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of forest type on carbon storage in the hilly region of Loess Plateau, China
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047
Authors

Zhihua Song, Peng Shi, Peng Li, Zhanbin Li, Hongbo Niu, Pengju Zu, Manhong Cao, Yili Jia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,182,109
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,710
of 332,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them