↓ Skip to main content

Post-urethroplasty complications in hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing polydioxanone and polyglactin sutures

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 189)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-urethroplasty complications in hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing polydioxanone and polyglactin sutures
Published in
World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/wjps-2023-000659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitinkumar Borkar, Charu Tiwari, Debajyoti Mohanty, Tridip Dutta Baruah, Manoj Mohanty, C K Sinha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,232,370
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#21
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,098
of 258,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.