The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remembering Professor Connie Eaves: an exceptional researcher, mentor and friend
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Hematology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.exphem.2024.104213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Kent, Louise E Purton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,112,283
of 26,314,972 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Hematology
#95
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,500
of 348,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Hematology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them