↓ Skip to main content

Spatially Segregated Macrophage Populations Predict Distinct Outcomes In Colon Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatially Segregated Macrophage Populations Predict Distinct Outcomes In Colon Cancer
Published in
Cancer Discovery, March 2024
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Matusiak, John W. Hickey, David G.P. van IJzendoorn, Guolan Lu, Lukasz Kidzinski, Shirley Zhu, Deana R.C. Colburg, Bogdan Luca, Darci J. Phillips, Sky W. Brubaker, Gregory W. Charville, Jeanne Shen, Kyle M. Loh, Derick K. Okwan-Duodu, Garry P. Nolan, Aaron M. Newman, Robert B. West, Matt van de Rijn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,210,535
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#981
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,497
of 200,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.