↓ Skip to main content

Understanding RCEM Best Practice Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Medicine Journal, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 4,605)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
166 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding RCEM Best Practice Guidelines
Published in
Emergency Medicine Journal, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/emermed-2024-213887
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Humphries, Adrian A Boyle, James France, Paul Hunt

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#11,315
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#4
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189
of 258,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.