↓ Skip to main content

Circulating microRNA signature predicts cancer incidence in Lynch syndrome – a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating microRNA signature predicts cancer incidence in Lynch syndrome – a pilot study
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, March 2024
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tero Sievänen, Tiina Jokela, Matti Hyvärinen, Tia-Marje Korhonen, Kirsi Pylvänäinen, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Juha Karvanen, Elina Sillanpää, Toni T. Seppälä, Eija K. Laakkonen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,958,331
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#568
of 1,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,629
of 170,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them