↓ Skip to main content

Meaning and identity of proofs in a bilateralist setting: A two-sorted typed Lambda-calculus for proofs and refutations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Logic & Computation, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 214)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meaning and identity of proofs in a bilateralist setting: A two-sorted typed Lambda-calculus for proofs and refutations
Published in
Journal of Logic & Computation, April 2024
DOI 10.1093/logcom/exae014
Authors

Sara Ayhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2024.
All research outputs
#7,308,999
of 26,368,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Logic & Computation
#18
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,064
of 349,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Logic & Computation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them